Skip to main content

Engaging Scientist in the Public Discourse


Source: picture was taken after the interview with my phone
         William Armstrong is an Earth Scientist who studies glaciology and is a new member to the App State team when he joined back in the fall of 2017. He received his PhD in Geological Sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder and BS of environmental Geoscience at the Boston College.
         So before going into this interview we first read one of Dr. Armstrong’s publications, “Spatial Patterns of Summer Speedup on South Central Alaska Glaciers,” and we went in with general questions on the article and on himself.
         We first asked how he would describe his own article to someone without a science background. His answer was very interesting, instead of spitting out more confusion, he really reached to explain it to us as a true educator. He began by explaining that glaciers move in two different ways, the first is by flowing with a thick fluid and the second is by sliding and or slipping on top of the bedrock. This process is called Basal Sliding, this is what he was observing for the article. Even though both process is affected by climate change Basal sliding occurs faster and provides a quicker way for how glaciers respond to climate change.
         Dr. Armstrong then explained how he got his data through satellite imagery. By taking an overhead picture of the glacier and then repeating that over time, they can see a change in the movement and how much the glacier has shifted. This research provides a look into the pattern of Basal Sliding across different glaciers and how they behave as a whole. This also allows for a better prediction of how glaciers will change and erode surrounding landscapes over time. When asked what was it that made him interested in spatial patterns of glaciers Dr. Armstrong responded more with an explanation of what he studies and why. He studies change on a human timescale, he has been more interested in things we can see and observe on the earth’s surface. This is change occurring fast enough to affect people and be affected by people. This is important because the study of glaciers is relevant to us now.
          He was then asked why he thought this information is important and what were the groups of people he was trying to reach. He then responds with “You don’t want to be doing science in a vacuum, you want to be doing science that contributes to our knowledge of how the world works.” The study was then conducted because they had little knowledge on what Basal sliding might look like and it allows them to predict how glaciers will change through simulated glaciers capturing reality and figuring out how they carve through land. When asked what the hardest part of the research was Dr. Armstrong gave two examples, the first was figuring out what he needed to extract from the data and the abundance of information so he could put it together in a unified story. The plots depicted in his article comes from about thirty images for each of the sixty-five glaciers. It was not as clean as it is now, it started with scattered data that he then had to turn in to a coherent plot. Bringing us to the second hardest part, treating it like a puzzle and figuring out what order things needed to go in and removing the bad data to leave behind the data that could tell something.
         We then dived a little deeper into him and what has gotten him to where he is today. We began by asking if he had any other intentions of becoming something other than an earth scientist. He said of course as any little kid would, but his dream was to become a “mow mow man” (a landscaper). As he got older he knew he was interested in science and started off as a biology major and later switched to geology in the attempts to avoid math and physics. He later discovered there is arguably more math and physics involved, but liked it and pursued a Geology degree. Even after figuring out what degree path he wanted to take he still did not have a plan on what to do next for a career and considered going into an industry for satellite data, environmental consulting, and many more. We then asked who his inspiration was or favorite scientist. Instead of giving us a cliché answer he responded with something a little more thoughtful and explained why his academic advisor Bob Anderson and a Glacioologist, Gwenn Flowers are his favorite scientist. Both advisors have two different approaches, however, he highly respects both and looks up to their approaches on being a mentor.
         Dr. Armstrong also explained to us the adaptability an academic scientist must have to find a job and why it can be so hard for someone to find a job. They must find a university, that has that particular department and a spot available for someone that fits their criteria. Someone who wants to be an academic scientist must be willing to adapt and have decided what they want for example, willing to live anywhere in the world and chase the job. This all worked out great for Dr. Armstrong because when asked what his favorite hobbies are he said they were rock climbing, biking, hiking, skiing and just being outside, which are great hobbies to have when you live in Boone. He was then asked what his favorite thing to teach was and ironically, he answered that he likes the classes that involve math because even though he thought he was bad at math he got better with practice and learned it was not an innate feature.
         We ended our interview with asking what advice would he give to a student who wanted to become a scientist.  He responded with that you must take math and physics, but you can get better at it and the math classes are often harder than what you will be applying in the field. More importantly, he explained that you must get over the hurdles, get involved in research and be curious because this is a field you must pursue the answers to your questions.
Again thank you so much to Dr. Armstrong for being so open and flexible with us! 
Here is also a link to his article:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017GL074370
 Here is more information about him: 
https://sites.google.com/appstate.edu/warmstrong/

Comments

  1. I like how you presented the information you collected and provided additional sources for more information on your professor. It sounds like your professor provided you with a lot of information and was very open to you and your classmate. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very thorough job! On the part about how well he explained it reminds me of quote by Einstein, "If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't really understand it."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent blog post Madilyn! It seems that your conversation with Dr. Armstrong was very productive. I also liked that you included some additional links at the end. Just a couple of minor edits I'd like you do to:
    -Include the source of the image
    -Separate the body of the text into paragraphs to it's easier to read through and more aesthetically pleasing.
    -Add a sentence at the beginning about where Dr. Armstrong did his PhD and what his focus was.

    Great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Madilyn, remember to address my comments and edit the post so I can give you all points available for this one.

      Delete
  4. Madilyn, this is super cool! I really appreciate how you included the way Dr. Armstrong addressed your first question in a way that was approachable. I think this is an important thing for people to understand; scientists are so approachable and willing to help.(in most cases lol)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Helping People Understand Science

Figure 1,  PEW Research Center          Science can be a very broad topic under a huge umbrella but, is very important to understand when applying it to today’s society. Often the significance of science is underrated and overlooked. We should ask ourselves why this is a popular phenomenon, is there a lack of education? Is science too difficult to understand? Does society not care enough? Or is it a combination of all these things.  When we look at the data from the Pew Research Center in Figure 1, specifically on climate change, there is a huge gap in the U.S. adults and AAAS scientists who think climate change is mostly due to human activity. This data is alarming considering there is so much accessible evidence on this topic. Scientist are considered more knowledgeable on the subject, however, their views seem to hold no important significance. Why is this when there are resources out there that reach to the public and explain our global issues efficiently.  Figure 2,

Science and I

Science and I did not start off so great. I went to an elementary school that decided putting social studies and language arts in one group and science and math into another group was a good idea. So when third grade came around and it was time to learn those infamous multiplication tables. My teacher told me I would have to memorize them or I would never excel in science. I am sure most people participated in the "get all these right within a certain time limit and win your next sundae topping." I was that kid with just a bowl and a scoop of ice cream, thank God they gave you the spoon. It wasn't until fifth grade that I realized how much of an idiot my third grade teacher was. (she was also very mean) Fifth grade was a year filled with learning about cloud formation, weather, plants. the water cycle, the effects the BP oil spill had on the environment, and so much more. My point is I did not need to spit out what seven times six was to my teacher. As time progressed and