Skip to main content

Helping People Understand Science



Figure 1, PEW Research Center
         Science can be a very broad topic under a huge umbrella but, is very important to understand when applying it to today’s society. Often the significance of science is underrated and overlooked. We should ask ourselves why this is a popular phenomenon, is there a lack of education? Is science too difficult to understand? Does society not care enough? Or is it a combination of all these things. When we look at the data from the Pew Research Center in Figure 1, specifically on climate change, there is a huge gap in the U.S. adults and AAAS scientists who think climate change is mostly due to human activity. This data is alarming considering there is so much accessible evidence on this topic. Scientist are considered more knowledgeable on the subject, however, their views seem to hold no important significance. Why is this when there are resources out there that reach to the public and explain our global issues efficiently. 


Figure 2,  https://youtu.be/b6CPsGanO_U 
        It’s no secret that there are plenty of ways for science to be explained to the public. Figure 2 is a great example; Asap Science is a YouTube channel dedicated to taking science topics and easily explaining them in a fun and interesting way. Bill Nye is also featured in this video, who is an icon recognized by many as the man who shared his love of science with all of us when we were young.


Figure 3, https://www.ted.com/
        The internet is an amazing thing, it allows us to share our own opinions and opens us up to so much information. TED is a great way to spread the ideas of so many in a powerful way. They don’t only cover science topics but this is still a great way to start discussions on major issues and spread understanding. Figure 3, features some of their top current stories and gives a look into what they offer.
        Of course, there are many ways to spread knowledge, my partner and I created our own game to encourage others to learn about the recent discovery of Archie. The name of the game is Myth or fact, and the objective is to be able to discern the truth about Archie. It is a simple card game that encourages competition between the players and during the game they are unintentionally learning more about Archie. I personally think the game is nice, simple, and practical. The game works well because it is new information to most and can be played with a varying amount of people. The downside is some of the statements on the cards are too advance for the players and requires previous knowledge of Archie but that adds to the learning experience of the game. There are clear instructions and rules to the game included in the deck and, all is neatly typed.  All and all I think the game is very effective. 

Picture provided by Mrs.Toran, taken at the Archie carnival as Dr, Heckert, (the lead in the discovery of Archie) tries the game out for himself





















Comments

  1. Okay, great job on this post Madilyn! Also on labeling the images properly, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is an awesome post. The text is very well-written and flows well between the different topics, but I also liked how you provided images and links to outside sources in order to enhance your point.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Engaging Scientist in the Public Discourse

Source: picture was taken after the interview with my phone          William Armstrong is an Earth Scientist who studies glaciology and is a new member to the App State team when he joined back in the fall of 2017. He received his PhD in Geological Sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder and BS of environmental Geoscience at the Boston College.          So before going into this interview we first read one of Dr. Armstrong’s publications, “Spatial Patterns of Summer Speedup on South Central Alaska Glaciers,” and we went in with general questions on the article and on himself.          We first asked how he would describe his own article to someone without a science background. His answer was very interesting, instead of spitting out more confusion, he really reached to explain it to us as a true educator. He began by explaining that glaciers move in two different ways, the first is by flowing with a thick fluid and the second is by sliding and or slipping on top of th

Climate change

Climate change is a pretty popular topic and is often misrepresented or construed to fit the biased of the author. To the untrained eye this graph can look accurate, however, once you dive deeper into it a lot of problems arise.  This ad supposedly came from the National Climatic Data center and is claiming 2012 has been the hottest year on record. First of all lets talk about the x-axis, that is not even labeled and the years have no order to them. The y-axis is not labeled as well and offers no units of measurements. Is it Fahrenheit? Celsius? Kelvin? No one knows and we can only assume it might be Fahrenheit because the graph insinuates this data is from the U.S. Also why does this only include U.S. data? Now are we the only ones experiencing climate change? In this graph it is also clear to see the authors viewpoint by skewing data in that direction and making the data for the year of 2012 red and appear significantly larger than the rest.With climate change being a pretty majo