Skip to main content

Engaging the Public with science


For the first hour of my service learning I helped blow up balloons and organize tickets for the Archie Carnival. From that I could definitely tell a lot goes into these events. However, for the last part of my service learning requirements I went to a panel discussion. It was titled “Keeping Climate Justice in the Center of Climate Policy.”  There were two main speakers, the first Elizabeth Marino and the second was Anthony Oliver-Smith.
Dr. Elizabeth Marino
 https://osucascades.edu/people/elizabeth-marino

Both speakers centered their discussion on climate displacement and the implications this can hold on poorer countries. Disasters are not shared equally by communities, most often un-industrialized countries can not bounce back as fast and experience a higher death toll. These ingenuous communities are even more vulnerable to weather disasters. Scientist also worry demographics will be reshaped due to the growing populations in low elevation places and the sea levels rising forcing a mass relocation. Dr. Marino coined this a “slow and rapid onset disaster.” So science can predict the likely outcome so the question then becomes what federal policies can be used to relocate? There are still many issues, for one, some policies still privilege certain groups and secondly there is no sense of urgency. If climate policies are enacted while in crisis, the climate justice will get pushed back. The proposed solution for this is to be rigorously compassionate, use scientific information and remember to be open when making policies.
Dr. Anthony Oliver-Smith
http://anthonyoliver-smith.net/
Dr. Oliver-Smith really touched on the logistics of resettlement and how it is disaster and climate change that induce displacement and resettlement. As mentioned earlier some societies have a higher chance of being greatly impacted by disasters, he coined this “historical construction of risk.” He talked about the importance of understanding the culture of these communities and how we must understand the political, economic, and institutional contexts of resettlement. Ultimately, resettlement impacts people’s well-being and resilience because resettled communities can not restructure society 100% the same. There will be a loss of culture. A great example to emulate is Gramalote Norte de Santander Colombia. They experienced a massive disaster and were forced to relocate, but their government proposed a different and unique solution. They rebuilt the communities and moved the communities back in how they were before, beside their old neighbors. Dr. Oliver really stressed how America in
The rebuilt community of Gramalote
http://gramalote-nortedesantander.gov.co/index.shtml
particular, is really bad at relocating and how we need to stop funding the construction of risk.
I really enjoyed this panel discuss and probably will attend more in the future. Apparently, this panel was all part of a series, I personally think this is a great way to spread understanding of science related topics. There were also other organizations there that share similar beliefs and provide more ways to spread knowledge, with websites, news papers/letters or word of mouth. In today's society there is so much access to science its almost impossible to ignore. The internet offers endless information and if you just know how to determine what information is unbiased and credible then access is limitless.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Engaging Scientist in the Public Discourse

Source: picture was taken after the interview with my phone          William Armstrong is an Earth Scientist who studies glaciology and is a new member to the App State team when he joined back in the fall of 2017. He received his PhD in Geological Sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder and BS of environmental Geoscience at the Boston College.          So before going into this interview we first read one of Dr. Armstrong’s publications, “Spatial Patterns of Summer Speedup on South Central Alaska Glaciers,” and we went in with general questions on the article and on himself.          We first asked how he would describe his own article to someone without a science background. His answer was very interesting, instead of spitting out more confusion, he really reached to explain it to us as a true educator. He began by explaining that glaciers move in two different ways, the first is by flowing with a thick fluid and the second is by sliding and or slipping on top of th
5 comments
Read more

Helping People Understand Science

Figure 1,  PEW Research Center          Science can be a very broad topic under a huge umbrella but, is very important to understand when applying it to today’s society. Often the significance of science is underrated and overlooked. We should ask ourselves why this is a popular phenomenon, is there a lack of education? Is science too difficult to understand? Does society not care enough? Or is it a combination of all these things.  When we look at the data from the Pew Research Center in Figure 1, specifically on climate change, there is a huge gap in the U.S. adults and AAAS scientists who think climate change is mostly due to human activity. This data is alarming considering there is so much accessible evidence on this topic. Scientist are considered more knowledgeable on the subject, however, their views seem to hold no important significance. Why is this when there are resources out there that reach to the public and explain our global issues efficiently.  Figure 2,
2 comments
Read more

Climate change

Climate change is a pretty popular topic and is often misrepresented or construed to fit the biased of the author. To the untrained eye this graph can look accurate, however, once you dive deeper into it a lot of problems arise.  This ad supposedly came from the National Climatic Data center and is claiming 2012 has been the hottest year on record. First of all lets talk about the x-axis, that is not even labeled and the years have no order to them. The y-axis is not labeled as well and offers no units of measurements. Is it Fahrenheit? Celsius? Kelvin? No one knows and we can only assume it might be Fahrenheit because the graph insinuates this data is from the U.S. Also why does this only include U.S. data? Now are we the only ones experiencing climate change? In this graph it is also clear to see the authors viewpoint by skewing data in that direction and making the data for the year of 2012 red and appear significantly larger than the rest.With climate change being a pretty majo
4 comments
Read more